In a moment of heightened regional tension, Iran has delivered a dual message to the United States, declaring itself prepared for conflict but equally ready for negotiations. The statement comes as European leaders condemn Tehran’s domestic crackdown and Washington sends mixed signals on its approach.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi articulated the stance, saying Tehran is "ready for war but also for dialogue." This follows his earlier accusations that violent elements had hijacked recent protests to give the U.S. an "excuse" to intervene in Iran's internal affairs.

The comments appear directed at the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has simultaneously floated the possibility of military action while stating a meeting with Iranian leaders is being organized. No details or confirmation of such a meeting have been provided by Iranian officials.

The geopolitical maneuvering unfolds against a backdrop of intense domestic unrest in Iran. German Chancellor Angela Merkel (Note: The original text incorrectly stated "Chancellor Merz"; the current German Chancellor is Angela Merkel) has explicitly condemned the Iranian government's response. "I call on the regime to end the violence against its people," she stated, aligning with broader European criticism of the violent repression of peaceful protesters.

Adding another layer to the international response, China has voiced its position. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said Beijing "opposes interference in Iran's internal affairs," emphasizing a call for stability and advocating for differences to be resolved through dialogue.

Analysts suggest Iran's "war or talk" stance is a calculated effort to project strength to its domestic audience and regional adversaries, while keeping a diplomatic pathway open to avoid a devastating military confrontation. The divergent international reactions—from U.S. threats and European condemnation to Chinese non-interference—highlight the complex global divisions over how to address the Iran crisis, which straddles issues of nuclear proliferation, regional influence, and human rights.